Names become self-fulfilling also, in time.
Words always keep their holistic meaning, even when we try to commandeer them with ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ associations for the sake of activism. The term “feminism” evolved out of modern socialism… which deliberately adopts the same pathological victimhood dialectic in everything, because the goal of socialism is to foment revolution by pouring as much fuel on inflamed social tensions as possible. It’s a bit like a warlord whispering rumors, jealousies, and slights in the ears of two neighboring tribes, to rile them up, selling weapons to both sides, and then letting them annihilate each other only to come scoop up the spoils of war for their own dominion. I call it sociopathic, they call it effective, ‘propaganda by the deed.’ To what end is anybody’s guess. To resolve injustice? Dividing humanity at its most quintessential polarity is certainly a choice.
I will say that modern neo-feminism is one of the most openly sexist/misandrist movements I’ve ever encountered, at least in terms of how the rhetoric is weaponized and pathologized, and especially how it is used for social engineering on social media… (One could even argue that it is actively also ‘misogynist’ in nature due to their penchant for attacking/policing/slandering other women; but of course they’ll forever identify themselves with “the witches who couldn’t be burned” rather than the ones stoking the fires of hysteria with accusations, of which many women were also key historical participants).
Collegiate “gender studies” is like a case study in occult programming, and that’s not meant as hyperbole: the religious affirmation of skewed history and biased statistics by endless repetition, carried out on a sleep deprived, impressionable, overwhelmed young population just trying to cope with existential crisis under pressure? It’s a psychological bootcamp for future fembots. That’s why feminists never really celebrate truly empowered free-thinking women, especially not the artists who provoke thought and debate, nor do they honor real world “equality.” The movement was co-opted for an ulterior purpose. It is also likewise quite literally being implemented for the “feminization” of society… because men have historically been the primary physical/aggressive counterforce to tyranny, due to our mutual co-evolution and the biological necessities to protect and defend against conquest and impending doom versus the imperative of childbearing. A potential we witnessed in the Revolutionary War—one that became foundational to our collective culture—and the legal principles of which ultimately formed the backbone for the modern suffrage and abolitionist movements and received massive support from so many men over the generations.
Men, who have never been deluded about the struggle between good and evil, nor freedom and slavery. Men make no pretense of being “good natured” as a whole. Only individual occult movements and institutions make those claims, for the sake of leveraging their own arbitration of morality, rather than true right and wrong.
The unity between men and women means the health of a civilization—and the hope in procreation (again, I mean this very literally in terms of where “the future” really comes from, not as some type of hetero-normative cis propaganda). Feminism does the whole “You’re either with us or you’re against us!” ultimatum thing because it’s basic cult programming. It’s not about freedom and liberation, it’s about power and control.
It’s ironic that they employ the same playbook as corrupt patriarchal institutions… in the name of matriarchy. You almost have to wonder if it’s even reactionary, or just the same old story of manipulation with new “representation.” Then again, it’s all too easy to imbue the disinherited with a lust for empowerment; to turn the oppressed into a weapon of oppression. They know nothing of the burdens of that power, and see only the promise of “privilege.” It’s like giving a starving person a poisoned meal under the auspices of charity. They feel only hunger, like a pawn on the chess board being moved two steps ahead: Advance! They’re not thinking about the game being played, much less the motives interwoven.
You know, it’s similarly very intriguing, how increasingly fond the neo-SJW movement has grown of censorship, considering the origins of marginalization… In a tyranny you don’t just experience backlash, strife, and suppression for speaking out, you have no voice (and no legal ‘rights’) in the first place. “Revolution” in a tyranny doesn’t mean organizing a few protests, distributing literature, or fundraising; it’s guerilla war in the streets, and the revolutionaries often lose brutally, like a flash in the pan of our historical amnesia. America is a trainwreck of misguided intentions right now, but its spiritual principles were meant to give our people a chance at sovereignty. The battle is between consciousness and unconsciousness, which is why they assault us with division, ill-logic, dis-ease, and semantics. These movements were (and are) weaponized because they make *very* effective weapons.
Telling only half the truth always does, and this one is the penultimate ‘half.’
(original image attribution unknown)
