Of apes and men

 

Something tells me she was hoping for a “we” in response here, and not an “I.”

Here’s the thing: Men don’t do hive minds. Men solve problems. Men invent and distribute tools, to be used by autonomous sovereign individuals: hand guns, pepper spray, tasers, tennis shoes, martial arts, tactical evasion, vehicles, fortresses, athletic training, maps of the terrain, education, knowledge, understanding, wisdom…

“Have you tried telling men not to rape?”

Yes. That was a bad plan. It turns out that men who are bad with boundaries don’t care that much about laws that can’t be enforced behind closed doors. It also turns out that predators deliberately seek vulnerable prey, often looking for specific cues, ease of access, opportunity, and other clues that defenses are down…

I can answer for me and my motives, I can’t answer for him.

As for “men”…? We’re always open to new ideas, assuming those ideas don’t create as many problems as they solve.

In fact, given the feminine love of government overreach, I’m barely authorized to protect you in the first place.

Social engineering (especially in the form of socialism and its many false promises) is a farce meant to keep you enslaved, not to liberate you. The justice system is largely a product of this, even at its best. It’s a promise to enforce the unenforceable, until we inevitably end up in a surveillance state with the belief that it will keep us safe.

Next idea?

Believe it or not, among men, rape is one of the single least respected actions/crimes that our fellow so-called men engage in. And this is a very widespread perspective even in prisons. If y’all think you’re the only ones who want to solve that problem, and all of its peripheral social consequences, you’re beyond delusional.

Consider however that if only 1 in 30 men were to sexually harass 10 women throughout the course of his lifetime, ultimately 1 in 3 women would become the victims… based on only 3.33% of men. And yet, I would not co-sign anywhere close to the 29/30 other men, nor the vast majority of women. Sociopaths alone are estimated to be at a higher percentage than this, and although not inherently dangerous, their most notable quality is a lack of intuitive compassion for fellow human beings…

Unfortunately rape is an incredibly difficult crime to retroactively seek justice for. Being that rape is a crime of opportunity, these men only prey upon those circumstances they perceive as highly likely to be a clean getaway (no witnesses, no cameras, behind closed doors, good alibi, likely also well-connected possibly even to law enforcement, wealth, or status, etc.)

The fact of the matter is… rape is not a crime that can easily be resolved by the justice system. It’s often a war of attrition to get a conviction, and that’s even *if* the police and legal system feel like focusing their resources on your particular case, which even at their most well-meaning they often don’t due to the sheer difficulty in a successful prosecution.

Dumbing this issue down does nobody any favors, and one of the worst possible things you could say to other men who have even the slightest understanding of how evidence is gathered in the justice system? It’s a femme favorite: “Believe women.” This despite the very real possibility of false accusations (estimated at 1-10%) and the much higher likelihood of incorrectly identifying the perpetrator (with 20-40% of cases where DNA evidence was available actually disproving the prime suspect as the perpetrator, while not disproving that a rape did or did not occur, highlighting that even witness testimony can be very unreliable).

You are losing ground with men on this issue because you are losing ground period in terms of jurisprudence.

Men are so deeply attuned to the danger in women that seditious men will actively use women against other men. Even if you were to completely absolve the dishonesty of other women (which is ridiculously unscientific in and of itself), we would still have the dishonesty of men to contend with and their use of duress against vulnerable women.

“Feminism: the idea that a woman is completely helpless in the face of a lone attacker, but would never ever under any circumstances be forced to yield to political pressure and be used as a chess piece.” To say nothing of the past century of intel wars, including everything from hypnosis and drugging to outright mind control, which I invite you to explore if you have the courage.

It’s not happening. Level up, y’all. And I suggest that you do it with integrity instead of this scorned woman psychopathic megalomaniac crap “defense.”

This is something men will never politically yield to you on, because it would be complete havoc without a real tactical approach to objectively solving the crime. It is pure muckraking hysteria in action, backed by the haunting specter of a very real threat.

Aloof statements only pour fuel on the fire and make men feel like feminism is committed to being pathologically untrustworthy and morally relativistic as an institution.

I’m sorry if that hurts you, but better to have your feelings hurt by the truth than your mind/body/soul destroyed by lies.

See more below.